Climate Change due to the increase of carbon from human activity is a “Global problem,” thus it has a couple of unique attributes compared with other world problems:
- It affects everyone
- You can act on it anywhere
I choose to act on this problem at home and at work. As part of this action, Tim and I chose to attend the Society of Organizational Learning’s (SoL) workshop based on Peter Senge’s book Necessary Revolution.
This three-day workshop leveraged long-time SoL content on leadership and mastery into the context of the global climate change. It was a fantastic workshop that I highly recommend – as it has changed me and my mental models.

Tim, our CEO, Peter and myself at the end of day three
Living in Boulder Colorado with tons of the worlds best climate scientist and a University that helps you Lean More About Climate, I am familiar with much of the science behind climate change. But, in this workshop we got to take our understanding up to the larger system level through system archetypes, multi-player games and simulations.
On the third day, we played with and did mock negotiations using the climate change system simulators that were built for negotiating teams going to Copenhagen in the next two weeks. The systems dynamics models baked into the C-Lean simulator are made more apparent in the Seed Simulator on Carbon flows. (It is a simple bath tub model of how carbon flows through the natural system.)
For your information, the answer to the simulation puzzle of putting climate change in check and keeping average global temperature from rising more that 2 degrees involves three things:
- have all countries in the world (un-developed, developing and developed) reduce there carbon output by 80% from 2005 levels by 2030
- stop deforestation efforts
- maximize reforestation efforts
To do this, the world will have to cross the threshold to a new game; an infinite game of win/win behaviors that measures success based on ecological restoration and social well-being. Finite game behaviors coming from zero-sum game thinking and patterns of shifting the burden and escalation will have to stop. I like to think of this an maturation of our species from wildly growing adolescents to young adults.
Peter’s 5th Discipline Fieldbook and The Dance with Change, come with tons of exercises, tools and guest lectures that are all helpful at understanding organizational learning and systems thinking. However, as Peter said in the workshop, understanding the concepts are easy, but practicing them can be much harder.
Part of the success of this public workshop was working with these concepts in a context of a global problem that we all share. We got to work on ourselves and a shared global issue. And as a result, we seemed to all have limitless energy and worked from 8:30 AM to 7 PM each day.
I encourage you to visit these sites, they give climate change a face and a shorter feedback loop. Both of these benefits can lead you and your teams to better understand and more easily act on this Global issue.
Thank you Tim, Peter, Sherry, Darci and all the other great folks who attended our workshop in DC. I have my joy and I will share it and my personal learning’s from this event in my next post.
About the Author: Ryan Martens is a telemark skier, founding board member of the Entrepreneurs Foundation of Colorado, and Founder and CTO at Rally Software Development. Subscribe today to get free updates by email or RSS.


[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Agile Blog, alohafromSF. alohafromSF said: Why I Loved SoL’s “Leading and Learning for Sustainability” Workshop http://ff.im/-crfTQ [...]
Ryan,
Global warming is a topic of deep concern to me. And since you just had a chance to work on this topic with simulators, maybe you can answer this a burning question I have had to which I cannot find an answer.
Why is a 2 degree temperature rise acceptable. If the ice caps are melting now, if the temperature rises 2 degrees, they will eventually all melt. And then we all now the general conclusions: sea level rises, ocean circulation may change in unexpected ways with the associated climate impacts, less reflective cooling by the white surface so warming effect is amplified, etc.
What did your models show?
Greg,
This topic was brought up last week as “well agreed upon assumption.” I think scientist believe that if we stay below a 2 degree swing the earth will keep a similar climate and without causing major changes in ocean currents. I am not sure the about the assumptions regarding the Greenland Ice Sheet? (totally melt?)
The feedback delay in temperature rise due to carbon build up is a big deal. The models that we played with showed us stopping the man-made growth of carbon in the atmosphere by 2030. According to the model that kept the temperature right at 2 degrees up in average.
Make sure to read this document on motivations on the C-LEARN site – http://forio.com/simulation/climate-development/htm/motivation.htm
Does that help?
Ryan
Thanks for sharing! I attended a SoL conference earlier this year and learned a ton. Glad you enjoyed it as well.