Fri 16 Apr 2010
What do Toyota, Tabaka, GM, and NUMMI have in Common?
My name is Jean Tabaka.
I live in an Agile and Lean world where we take a “stop the line” mentality for granted. I am encouraged to give my observations and recommendations about continuous improvement. I’ve been learning to create my own reality, to continue learning and to find my strengths in cross-functional work. I passionately read about, talk about, and practice Agile and Lean principles. These principles continually inform how I can create benefit for my company and how I derive benefit from my company.
I’m the lucky Tabaka.
My father, Jim Tabaka, was a life-time white collar worker for GM, starting fresh out of University of Illinois with his mechanical engineering degree. He worked 12 hour days, on his feet the entire time, walking the plant floor, making sure cars kept coming off the line at all costs. He retired at age 55 with a great pension and unbelievable health benefits.
My brother Tim Tabaka is a retired GM blue collar autoworker. Well, retired is the euphemism for, “Would you please leave early so that we can bring in a younger, less experienced, cheaper workforce?” During his time at GM he worked any shift he was told to work. He even moved to a different, older plant. Why? He needed the job and they wanted to replace the older workforce with a cheaper, younger workforce.
My nephew, Andrew Tabaka is a current GM autoworker. He came in under-skilled and now works a night shift for a GM subsidiary building brake assemblies. Andrew is one of the people Tim trained on his way out. Andrew is 24 and this is his first job. I suspect he intends it to be his life-time job. Well.
I’ve never worked for GM but learned to drive a stick-shift on a Chevy Corvette (yes!) And, while growing up, my dad used to take me to visit the plant where he worked in St. Louis. The acres of parking lot outside the plant were for all the cars that had rolled off the line but could not be shipped to a dealer. Too many defects.
Get the picture? We have been and are a GM family.
And I’m telling you this for a reason.
In 1984, GM and Toyota entered into the NUMMI (New United Motor Manufacturing Inc.) agreement to co-run an auto plant in Fremont CA. NUMMI made big news at the time. It took an existing, highly dysfunctional GM workforce and turned them into one of the most productive auto plants in the US. A documentary about this recently aired on Ira Glass’s “This American Life”. What a story, too fantastic to be made up: the complete turn-around of a failing GM plant to a thriving joint venture. The documentary recounts 30 disgruntled, unmotivated GM employees traveling to Japan to work with Toyota employees to learn “The Toyota Way”. It features commentary from Jeffrey Liker (author of “The Toyota Way”) John Shook (author of “ Managing to Learn”) as well GM line workers and GM management. The power punch of the Ira’s story? GM never replicated the success at the NUMMI plant. Several theories about this failure are postulated at the end of the documentary. It is up to the listener to form their own conclusions.
Two weeks ago, as a coda to the documentary:
The Fremont NUMMI plant had its last Corolla roll off the line. NUMMI was shut down, this time for good. It was the first factory ever shut down by Toyota.
I care both personally and professionally about that darn NUMMI plant. The Ira Glass documentary about NUMMI’s turnaround and GM’s failure to replicate struck a deep chord for me. I called my brother Tim that evening to get the real scoop. I had heard him recount what his life was like in a GM plant and I wanted to hear it from him again.
The truth is the NUMMI success DID have an impact on GM outside the Fremont plant. Prior to the NUMMI conversion, life in the Oklahoma City plant where Tim worked was miserable. As in the story “Rivethead” by Ben Hamper about GM plant life in the 1970’s, alcohol abuse, absenteeism and nervous breakdowns were common place at Tim’s workplace. He lived the life documented about the Fremont plant prior to the Toyota venture.
Life with the Andon.
In the late 1980’s though, Tim told my about how things were changing, amazingly so. A “stop the line” mentality was adopted at their plant. Use of an “andon” was introduced. One tug on the andon was the alert to call over for some help; a second tug was “stop the line” we need more time to fix this. Tim was one of the people who roamed the plant floor prepared to assist when the andon was pulled once so that it wouldn’t have to be pulled again. Every station had its own andon “song”. (Apparently the “Baby Elephant” song became the bane of my brother’s existence.)
Life was so much better (the “Baby Elephant” notwithstanding). Workers were encouraged to stop the line and fix problems versus pushing cars through. Teams were brought together to offer suggestions for how to improve the work processes and the flow within the plant. Quality went way up and defects went down. Morale and motivation went up. Alcohol and drug abuse went down (this is anecdotal from my brother, not based on an actual study.) And for Tim personally, plant life improved dramatically. The new system played into his strength: being a cross-functional team member, challenged and rewarded for doing his work.
Back to the NUMMI story and what GM ultimately adopted.
Fair enough. I have my brother Tim as an example of an autoworker who benefited (well, except for the darn “Baby Elephant” team’s issues). But I also have a father who, as a GM executive was expected to tirelessly follow and communicate the GM line. It took its own deep toll on him. And I have a nephew who continues to work as a very replaceable night shift cog in a different plant in the GM machine. GM has declared bankruptcy for any number of reasons. And now, my mother’s benefits, my brother’s pension, and my nephew’s pay are in peril.
My name is Jean Tabaka, daughter of Jim Tabaka, sister of Tim Tabaka, and aunt of Andrew Tabaka. My father never benefited from Lean thinking. My brother had a wonderful brief taste of it. And my nephew is now somewhere in an odd stew of Lean and non-Lean practices.
I’m the lucky Tabaka. Lean has brought me a lot and taught me a lot in my Agile world. While Lean may be most closely affiliated with the Toyota Production System; and while it may be assumed that failure to adopt the TPS was GM’s ultimate demise, I believe the Lean lessons have continued to grow, spread, and morph as a result of both success and of failure in Lean adoptions.
GM, Toyota (yes Toyota), NUMMI, the Oklahoma City plant and others all have their stories of success and failure. Each had their approach to Lean adoption. Like Tim Tabaka and NUMMI, we have our lessons to learn from Lean in our software world. Lean is not the panacea. The TPS cannot tackle all issues. Agile is not the panacea. No one methodology can guarantee product success in all situations. Our continued belief in checking the value of our adoptions is critical. Our conviction to pay attention to failure modes as well as success is key. If you don’t believe me, ask my brother Tim.


[...] this article: What do Toyota, Tabaka, GM, and NUMMI have in Common? | Agile Blog … Tags: line, [...]
Thanks for the interesting historical profile in this post.
It strikes me that the decline of GM, and US manufacturing in general, is as much socio-political as it is business-process oriented.
Fortunately for all of us making a living at consulting, it is easier to improve business processes, and to build high-value software, than it is to make incremental progress in the political sphere.
Thank you for your comment Bob. Indeed, the entire complex system in which GM, Toyota, NUMMI and my family work(ed) has so many factors as to not be able to pinpoint one as THE success factor or THE failure factor. I was thinking about this a little while I was writing the post. Now I am thinking about it all the more.
We seem all too ready to praise Toyota for its successes because of TPS. And to blame GM for its failures because of lack of TPS. This just seems too binary for my liking. My brother has helped me think about this even more.
I talked with my mother after I wrote this post. She hasn’t read it yet (I have to send her a print out of it because she doesn’t want to have to spend time powering up her computer to read it :-) She reminded me that, in fact, prior to my dad’s decision to retire from GM, he had been slated to head to Japan for some training. Was it on TPS? Empowering people? Eliminating waste? Well, yes and no. My dad’s specialty at the St. Louis plant toward the end of his tenure was everything to do with paint: from the primer to first coat to bake to final finish. He was heading to Japan to learn about how the Japanese were using robotics for part of this process. Was that more about quality? Reducing cost? Eliminating jobs? Getting cars through the grueling paint process faster? Probably all of the above. Do we associate robotics with TPS? Probably not.
GM certainly has adopted a great deal of robotics in the past 20 years. So, was that considered a success factor for Toyota and yet a failure factor for GM? Or are robotics parity and not differentiating? It’s just too complex. Ultimately, to Dennis’s and Jan’s point, my story asks us to remember that people are involved. I really like that Dennis brings out Deming’s approach to systems and knowledge. Thanks Dennis!
Two steps forward, one step back go a long way when it is your brother who is impacted. NUMMI DID have an impact in the US. GM DID learn from Toyota. Toyota has just gone through a huge quality embarrassment in the last 3 months so maybe it is learning something from GM. So I will say it again a different way. I don’t believe putting successes (Toyota) in one corner and failures (GM) in another corner will ever tell the full story. We are squarely in the goo in the middle. I just want to keep finding those two steps forward and learn from the one step back. I believe that is our intent (or should be) in how we deliver high quality software applying Lean and Agile principles.
Thanks,
Jean
Poignant…
Thanks so much for sharing, Jean!
Israel
I also really enjoyed this episode of This American Life. I have been using the NUMMI story as a way to show that process awareness can bring about positive change. Agile is out of the question in my current environment, so when it gets mentioned most people brush it off, but when I share the story of NUMMI people’s heads turn and they listen. It’s not the Agile word. I guess it is the shock value of the downfall of GM. They want to know how such a turnaround is possible for the same factory crew that doesn’t require some type of magic. Then, like everyone else, is shocked that GM couldn’t effectively transfer the successful NUMMI model, even when they saw their ship sinking for 50 years and motivated people who wanted to spread it.
At some point everyone is faced with a situation where the process isn’t working correctly. Most of the people I discuss Agile with are married to the Waterfall and fail to realize an effective way to incorporate continual improvement or they are the type of shop that lacks any type of a formalize process. Agile gets dismissed for any number of reasons, but to me it is a no brainer. Just turn the traditional GM assembly line into the waterfall. It isn’t a far stretch. Both the waterfall and the GM assembly line can be successful, but every time I’m left feeling helpless because the waterfall keeps turning and the assembly line can’t stopped, I just think – ‘Oh no, just like GM!’
Great view of GM & NUMMI – thanks for recounting it. I also caught the story on This American Life and enjoyed the show; worth a listen for all Agile people. I though it described many classic failure modes for Organizational Change. John Kotter’s 8 steps model for Change was based upon his research of many failed attempts at Org change. This story is a classic to add to that body of knowledge.
A must know for Agile Transformation coaches.
It was a great story wasn’t it? I was struck by one conjecture about NUMMI’s success versus other GM plants: the “turnaround” effort at NUMMI was seeded by first shutting down the existing GM plant and “firing” all employees. An agreement had been made with the management and union, however, that when the plant reopened, it would open with existing GM employees. The next step was to have a subset of GM employees head to Toyota to work/live side-by-side with their Toyota counterparts. I think that can’t be overstated. They bonded with their Toyota colleagues. Everyone was in it together. They had a tearful farewell when it was time to head back to California.
When GM tried to bring the same concepts to their Van Nuys plant, it was a dismal failure (according to the stories told in the documentary.) I have two broad stroke ideas about this.
The first is about systems thinking and how change has to come from an outside agent. In the Van Nuys plant, no-one was forced outside of the system. They were staying in the same system and being asked to change. The union became defensive; the management became protective. Neither side was willing to break the system that had brought them to where they were.
The second is about how to gel high-performing teams. NUMMI had the GM workers leave the plant, join their counterparts in Japan and create high trust. They became a high-performing team. The Van Nuys plant did not do this. So distrust held the workforce back from adopting a new approach.
For those of you who didn’t hear the “This American Life” documentary, I’ll tell you now that, in the end, the Van Nuys plant was forced to shut down because neither management nor the union would adopt the new system. And, they didn’t believe that the plant would truly be shut down. They were GM after all, jobs for life and a great pension was the bargain they had made and expected to hold. Oops.
Thanks,
Jean
Jean,
Lovely story. I truly enjoy your honesty and passion.
A couple of interesting thoughts (to me any way) that occurred as I read your post. First, environment drives behavior and the resulting culture. The ability of the team to pull the Andon changed the workers belief about their work – empowerment led to improved costs, lead time, and quality. Through policy and will, management is a significant contributor to environment.
The other thought is how closely this aligns with Deming’s belief that if you manage costs – costs go up and quality goes down. But when you create an environment where quality can thrive – costs go down and quality goes up.
Hi Jean,
Fascinating story — both the “This American Life” piece and even more so your personal, family GM odyssey. Building an environment in which people can truly take ownership of their work, the Andon cord being the most powerful symbol in the NUMMI story, changes everything, literally. The material and human wreckage some companies leave in their wake is the clearest evidence that there is definitely a better way to work.
Thank you for sharing your story!
Jan
Thanks Jan,
Here is another interesting twist to the story. I learned this from talking with my brother after he had a chance to read the post. He still remembers that, when the Fremont plant switched over to NUMMI, some of the original GM workers refused to work there. They came to the Oklahoma City plant were my brother Tim worked. Huh!!?!?!
Yes, to this day, my brother says it was totally baffling. There were line workers who didn’t want to work in a more empowered, collaborative-with-management way. There must have been such an ingrained sense of distrust and a desire to just do a job and go home every night and not change anything year in and year out.
I would guess they weren’t too happy when some of those practices started arriving in Oklahoma City :-)
Thanks,
Jean
Like I told you when I saw the draft – Beautiful. This is classic Tabaka laid out on the pages. Passionate Education – the best stories to learn by.
Thank you for sharing!
Ryan
What I appreciate most about this story is that it’s about people. We need to remember that work is about people, not numbers on a spreadsheet or resources. It’s the people that matter. It’s the people that have to buy into the way they work.
Thanks, Jean, for an insider’s look at how process changes, good and bad, affect the people on the line, the ones doing the work.
Maybe that’s how the Andon cord theoretically works at a GM plant, but at NUMMI, your description of how the Andon cord is used is completely foreign to me.
Theoretically, you pull the Andon cord to get help making a repair. If it takes too long to repair, you stop the line. But that’s not how it is at NUMMI. If you stop the line, the Group Leader (foreman) will come over and and tell you that you don’t need to stop the line. Even when there are serious defects, they do anything to keep you from stopping the line. If you stop the line too much, you will be targeted for retaliation.
Efficiency comes by NOT stopping the line. If you can get people to work harder and faster with no objections, you increase efficiency. If people actually stop the line to fix defects, then management really did not understand what the Toyota Production System really was all about.
The TPS system is all about keeping the line going. You can stop the line, but there is a tremendous amount of pressure upon the worker to NOT stop the line either through the Team Leader (the repair guy) making repairs while the car is moving and doing it quickly or by having the worker work much faster. You get them to do it with fear and peer pressure. The whole idea behind TPS is that “stopping the line” is something you can do to make it look like the worker has a degree of control which creates an illusion of worker control; but in practice, you come up with whatever methods necessary to keep the worker from ever stopping the line. Unfortunately, most managers resort to fear and intimidation to keep workers from stopping the line. That’s how it really works at NUMMI.
I believe that NUMMI did not live up to the “ideals” of the TPS, as you point out. I think that was a huge failing. Neither my brother or my dad or my nephew worked at NUMMI. I do know from direct discussions with my brother that the work at his plant DID change once the andon was introduced. Prior to this and other practices (such as kaizen), workers were NEVER allowed to stop the line. NO process improvement was ever made.
In software development, stopping the line too often means turbulence in flow of value. It is not expected to be an on-going practice. Rather, it is meant to flag systemic issues as soon as they occur, bring in a kaizen for process improvement, not let defects through, and have fewer and fewer “line” stoppages.
We still struggle with this whole “stop the line” mentality in our own company. We want continuous flow of value. What I will say, is that I honestly believe we continually look at our processes. They have changed dramatically in the 7 years I have been here. And even last week, we had major discussions about fundamental issues around our process that still need careful attention. We learn about this from the software engineers and the testers and the product marketing people all engaged in getting our product out.
NUMMI’s inability to listen to the issues seen by and experienced by the line workers were IMHO its demise. Toyota’s current issues, I believe, are also stemming from this. They have moved from continuous improvement as their number one objective to bigger and bigger profits. They have fundamentally taken their eye off the continuous flow of value picture. And it has cost them dearly in the marketplace.
Thanks for your feedback.
Quite the coincidence…
I both worked at NUMMI and with a Tabaka…an Iowan Tabaka….
Although I worked there over 10 years ago I feel a lot of sadness that it’s gone. There were many people there I had a lot of respect for…unfortunately there were outnumbered by incompetent union lackeys.
I did enjoy working with the Tabaka from Iowa though.
Rich,
Wow! What a coincidence. My family is from Missouri, so I guess pretty close to being an Iowan Tabaka. I will be sure to tell my brother about the Tabaka at NUMMI.
I believe that there are some people ill-prepared, for whatever reasons in their lives, to truly “show up” and really be engaged in their work. That is sad when people like you so valued the change in culture at NUMMI.
I received one comment (for some reason it didn’t show up here even though I accepted it) that the NUMMI story is not really true. That the truth was really about NOT stopping the line, among a variety of other problems. My Missouri Tabaka brother reconfirmed to me how they took the positive NUMMI lessons and applied them in Oklahoma. To wit: one pull on the andon meant that there was a potential problem. That is when my brother Tim would spring into action and go to the problem (what the Japanese refer to as “gemba” I believe). Yes, the team would do everything it could to NOT stop the line. However, when a problem could not be remedied, a second pull on the andon stopped the line. Hence my brother’s loathing of the “Baby Elephant Walk” to this day. It was an area that seemed to always have problems and thus require Tim to jump and potentially the line to stop.
I’m glad you enjoyed working with the Iowan Tabaka; I think you would have really liked working with the Missourian too :-)
Jean
A great story, Being from Detroit and at one time till 1980 worked for GM, my 2 brothers still works for GM, my father retired from GM, my grandfather retired from GM, SO yes I am familiar with GM. I am familiar with GM Engineers always telling me on how its a global climate, on how they shop at Wal-Mart and how i am un-American not buying a GM car in the same freaking sentence. I am familiar with the union people bragging on how they pulled one over on GM on calling in sick for first shift and going in on 2nd shift to get paid double time when everybody is on overtime. Yes I hear my brother brag in 2004 when Bush was giving GM so much money, Yes I know between 2002 and 2008 for every plant that closed in the USA, they open one in China, I do know I just want to throw up every time I hear some freaking GM employee (there by far the worse) tell me all others suck explicitly Toyota and GM builds the highest quality cars in the world, (While the rest of the world calls GM the worst engineered cars) My God GM, just build a better car, I feel embarrassed as a normal person when they go on there anti Japan rants, just build a better car.
John, your story really hits my heart. I know so many people of the mentality you mention. It was such a toxic environment that bred toxic talk and mentalities. I also know my brother and his integrity while working on the line. He worked hard and believed (amazingly despite the conditions) in his work. And I knew my dad’s integrity while working his entire life in GM management,not at a desk but walking that oven in St. Louis known as the St. Louis Chevy plant. And, I agree with you, “Just build a better car.” I think GM sat like a fat cat in the “Take-make-waste” mentality of the 20th century industrialists. There was incredible ego about what you could do with people and other natural resources. The supply is limitless so dignity was low and waste was high. And quality just didn’t matter. I saw that. And in such an environment, the “it doesn’t matter” attitude “rolls down hill.” I see how GM and former GM employees have paid/are paying the price now. I don’t know what the outcome will be. I can tell you this. My father would be embarrassed. My brother is embarrassed. They have both moved on. Thank you again for this thoughtful reply. Jean